Joint Workshop LANL/NIMS Quantum and Functional Materials and MANA International Symposium 2024


Quantum Materials - 13

Title

Synthesis of Large-Area GeS Thin Films on Insulator Substrates

Author's photo

Authors

Worapon Phatcharasirinawakun1,2, and Hiroyuki Yamase1,2

Affiliations

1. Quantum Material Properties Group, MANA, NIMS
2. Graduate School of Science, Hokkaido University

URL

https://www.nims.go.jp/nqt/yamase/index.html

Email

PHATCHARASIRINAWAKUN.WORAPON@nims.go.jp

Abstract

Unlike conventional superconductors described by the BCS theory, the high-Tc superconductivity of cuprates and iron pnictides is believed to be driven by strong electron correlation effects. In particular, electronic nematic fluctuations have drawn significant interest and their role in the superconductivity offers an interesting subject [1]. The nematic instability leads to a state, which breaks only the rotational symmetry but preserves the translational symmetry. Recent studies [2-4] have identified the superconductivity near a nematic quantum critical point. However, they reached different conclusions about the pairing symmetry: Ref.[2] reported the d-wave symmetry whereas Refs.[3] and [4] the s-wave symmetry. To resolve this contradiction, we employ the Eliashberg theory, which accounts for the electron self-energy effect and the retardation effect. These effects were not considered in the previous studies [2-4] and can play an important role to the pairing symmetry, which we wish to discuss in our poster. In addition, the superconductivity can occur also inside the nematic phase, more generally in the presence of spatial anisotropy [5]. We wish to discuss the pairing symmetry even in this case.


Reference

  1. H. Yamase and R. Zeyher., Phys. Rev. B 88, 180502, (2013). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.180502
  2. T. A. Maier and D. J. Scalapino, Phys. Rev. B 90, 174510, (2014). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.174510
  3. S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 097001, (2015). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevLett.114.097001
  4. S. Lederer, Y. Schattner, E. Berg, and S. A. Kivelson, PNAS 114(19), (2017). DOI 10.1073/pnas.1620651114
  5. H. Yamase, Phys. Rev. B 91(19), 195121, (2015). DOI 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.195121